Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (81975)	3/14/2003 4:11:40 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) of 281500

He already has a "weapon of mass destruction". Yes, but it is a "MAD" situation, on a non-nuke basis. Either can hurt the other badly. But the NK's know they will lose. Will they do a "Crazy Korean" and hit Seoul if we take out their processing plant? That is a the big risk. The other risk is later, if we don't take them out. Negotiation means we give them the important things they want, and we get in return the important things we want That's right. We give in and pay them off, and they give in and don't build and sell Nukes. But there is no way we can know for sure with them. And they cheat. It is a very tough situation JC. I don't want to see us have to move on NK. What we have here is a "Hobsons Choice."

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next