SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : War

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (19561)3/14/2003 4:33:30 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (3) of 23908
 
Friday, March 14, 2003 Adar2 10, 5763

Settlers refused to accept Druze soldiers as guards at their outpost

By Amos Harel


Settlers in an illegal West Bank outpost refused to accept Druze IDF troops as part of the security detail at their settlement, citing "Halakhic considerations," which they said forbid the use of gentile soldiers to protect a Jewish family.

The incident occured a number of weeks ago and ended with the Israel Defense Forces brigade commander insisting that the men assigned to the security detail be allowed to carry out their orders, overruling the settlers complaint.

The illegal outpost is held by a single Israeli family with a number of young men providing additional security.

Even though the outpost is considered illegal, and the IDF planned on a number of occasions to dismantle the caravans and evacuate the residents, the army continues to provide the settlers with security. This is part of a policy where the security of Israeli citizens cannot be undermined, irrespective of the legal status of their place of residence in the territories.

The IDF maintains a permanent security detail at the outpost, comprised of two conscripts from a rearguard unit, whose role is to supplement the security of the settlers.

In this case, however, when the settlers realized the guards were Druze, they insisted they leave the settlement and return to their base.

The settlers, members of the "hilltop youth," considered to be among the most extreme of settler groups, argued that the presence of gentiles in the area, providing security to a Jewish family, is forbidden by the Jewish faith.

haaretz.com

The best joke of the day: "Halakhic considerations," which they said forbid the use of gentile soldiers to protect a Jewish family. --LOL! Len, how come Israeli authorities have not clued those freak settlers in on Israel's chief sponsor, the US?? Israeli fanatics should be told that their whole Zionist trip relies exclusively on the goodwill of GENTILE America... their topnotch military gear is paid for with GENTILE US dollars... and their most fervent supporters in America are holy rollers and Jesus freaks from the Cracker Belt --not Manhattan liberals....

Gus
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext