Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (82015)	3/14/2003 10:45:39 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

"....it is very possible, we "solve" this problem with one or more small tactical nukes. That may be the only method to save Seoul; all conventional means wouldn't work fast enough....." <the NK's know they will lose> "If Seoul is destroyed, we lose, and the S. Koreans will never forgive or forget, even if we go on to do Regime Change in N. Korea." So are you saying we should use tactical nukes to save seoul or are you implying that the US has caused this crisis and the the destruction of seoul as seen by the SKs? <they cheat> "We cheat. An honest look at what was promised in the 1994 agreement, by both sides, and then what was actually done, is that neither side kept their word. " How did we cheat? First i have heard of that. And if you can prove we did something wrong, who did it first and what are the differences in scale? They snooker Jimmy and Billy because there was more Trust than Verify and you blame the US and Bush. You really have a completely negative and jaundiced view of your country's fp, re: North Korea. Next you will tell us that Kim had justification to kidnap those japanese civilians or saddam was within his rights to gas the kurds? mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next