SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Attack Iraq?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: H-Man who wrote (4561)3/14/2003 4:17:00 PM
From: H-Man  Read Replies (1) of 8683
 
The Arguments: III - It will cost too many Innocent lives.

War is terrible. Although I believe the US will take reasonable steps to protect innocent lives, it is more likely than not, that some civilians will be killed.

However, if civilian loss of life is the measurement, then this MUST be balanced against how many civilian lives (US and Iraqi) will be lost if Saddam stays in power.

The lives taken by Saddam are well documented and continue to this day. In one town in Kurdistan alone, there were 10,000 killed. He continues to this day. A newscaster made a joke about his wife. The newscaster was tortured, hanged and her tongue was cut out when the corpse was returned to the family. In early February, an Iraqi missile engineer was executed to prevent him passing vital information to United Nations weapons inspectors. The list goes on and on.

Innocent lives are lost everyday in Iraq. Standing by allows it to continue. Not that I am saying this is why we should get rid of Saddam, (although this should be sufficient reason), only that if the left's concern is for innocent life, then in order to be honest, they should be in favor of invading Iraq, since it is plainly evident that Saddam has and continues to murder civilians.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext