Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Steeny who wrote (82836)	3/17/2003 12:06:45 AM
From: BCherry168	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Steeny, the difference between Bush I and Bush II is that Bush II is more like his Mom than his Pop ( who was a good guy, but let the UN mandate keep him from finishing the job). Bush II has a lot more balls. Plus, he is dealing with a far different dynamic than his Dad. 9/11 marked a huge turning point in world affairs, much like Pearl Harbor. The President of the United States can no longer assume that the homeland is safe from attack by the outlaws of the world. To protect the homeland, the President has to round up the outlaws. If we don't do that, the threat will continue. And the folks in the homeland want to be safe from the threat, and will insist upon that. George W. Bush is going to do all he can to reduce the threat, and is not going to let scumbags like Chirac get in the way. And that is precisely what he should do. If the UN cannot be effective in stopping the threats, then it becomes irrelevant, just like the League of Nations did in another era. And for the same reason. RIP.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next