SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clappy who wrote (14778)3/17/2003 5:31:58 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 89467
 
Sorry Clappy, but that's just not how I operate. I did
there on the YAHOO GMGC thread as I have done here on
SI........ compare their own words against cold, hard,
irrefutable facts & exposed lies & obvious deceit that was
posted for personal gain. If you ever read shorts who post
on YAHOO, you know exactly what I am talking about.

How could I possibly claim that someone was a liar for
making a price prediction some time in the future & claim
my comments have any credibility whatsoever? You know me
much better than that. You know that is clearly not my
style. You know damn well that I stick to the facts & use
folks own words against genuine facts (or in some cases
when I know for a fact that a false claim, such as Senator
Kerry's obviously false claim about Bush & his
Administration claiming a link between Iraq & 9/11, that
was never made).

I understand your desire to stick with your NNMB peers & I
know your disdain for President Bush, but that doesn't
change the fact that your comment was unwarranted, <vbg> or
not. You've used that <vbg> all too often to make similar
pokes at me, but you never follow it up with any comments
acknowledging that there is merit to what I have done or
said here & elsewhere on SI. If you think I am wrong, why
not post several examples where I am clearly wrong & I
don't admit to it myself. If not, why don't you ever follow
up some of those <vbg> jabs with some credible
acknowledgment of the merit that I have exposed obvious
lies, etc. on this thread & elsewhere on SI?

Oh, BTW, GMGC never traded @ $262/share (unless it traded
there long before I followed it, like their IPO or
thereabouts). That number was skewed by a large reverse
split........ which occurred long after I had soured on
GMGC & had openly criticized them for a number of serious
mistakes.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext