Sorry Clappy, but that's just not how I operate. I did there on the YAHOO GMGC thread as I have done here on SI........ compare their own words against cold, hard, irrefutable facts & exposed lies & obvious deceit that was posted for personal gain. If you ever read shorts who post on YAHOO, you know exactly what I am talking about.
How could I possibly claim that someone was a liar for making a price prediction some time in the future & claim my comments have any credibility whatsoever? You know me much better than that. You know that is clearly not my style. You know damn well that I stick to the facts & use folks own words against genuine facts (or in some cases when I know for a fact that a false claim, such as Senator Kerry's obviously false claim about Bush & his Administration claiming a link between Iraq & 9/11, that was never made).
I understand your desire to stick with your NNMB peers & I know your disdain for President Bush, but that doesn't change the fact that your comment was unwarranted, <vbg> or not. You've used that <vbg> all too often to make similar pokes at me, but you never follow it up with any comments acknowledging that there is merit to what I have done or said here & elsewhere on SI. If you think I am wrong, why not post several examples where I am clearly wrong & I don't admit to it myself. If not, why don't you ever follow up some of those <vbg> jabs with some credible acknowledgment of the merit that I have exposed obvious lies, etc. on this thread & elsewhere on SI?
Oh, BTW, GMGC never traded @ $262/share (unless it traded there long before I followed it, like their IPO or thereabouts). That number was skewed by a large reverse split........ which occurred long after I had soured on GMGC & had openly criticized them for a number of serious mistakes. |