SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FaultLine who started this subject3/17/2003 7:59:15 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Some conclusions that imo might well be drawn by members of the community of nations post-GWB's elective war.

~ It is folly to submit to an inspection/disarmament process because the possibility exists that some member of the sponsoring inspection/disarmament organization will, after the destruction of some part of your armaments, attack you, even if a majority of other sponsors opposes such action.

~ A very good thing to have is a nuclear arsenal, like North Korea's, to deter unfriendly behemoths.

~ And if you do have WMD, you should not concentrate them, but instead disperse them widely, sharing them with nations friendly to you and hostile to your adversaries.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News