Than we disagree, because there is no nobler cause than to protect the innocent. Self defense is the major Political claim for invasion, but self defense takes a back seat to the morality of saddams true record.
For me the hypothetical threat is real and in this case supportable, but it is based on saddams lack of morality, which makes him the danger that he is.
So the moral issue is supreme, and because I do not support the subversion of our constitution to the un, the un weighs not a twit with me. If I were a diplomat employed and invested in the course of diplomacy,I might feel differently but I'm not so i dont..
idi amin, hitler, saddam, these are despots, once evidence of their cruelty emerges, the world must take definitive action; it should be a metric of the NEW N that dictators are not welcome in our world and they should never be allowed to gain a foothold. All politics aside. |
