Ted Re...Are you suggesting that I blindly follow a leader who entered the presidency in a questionable manner; who has embarked on a track that many question the logic and wisdom behind it; who can't make can make a justifiable argument to support this questionable path? I don't think so.
That is your interpretation, not mine? I simply said that this country is founded on the democratic principle, that whoever is chosen, is the leader, until the next election. Now you say you can't abide by the last election, because you personally don't like Gw. I say, the principle that this country was founded on, that every citizen agrees that whoever won the presidential election, is the president for for all of us, including you, means you cannot say GW isn't your president. You may disagree, hate Gw or whatever, but GW is your president, like it or not.
I may have to obey Bush and defer to him but I do not have to call him my president. This is not the USSR.
What duplicity, what an incredible double standard........Ray never once recognized Clinton as president.
Frankly, if David said that, then he is wrong too. I don't remember David ever saying that, but if he did, he would be wrong also.
Well, thank you for that.
When you all can't prove your point, you threaten.
Link please. When did I ever threaten you.?
You all is plural and stands for the conservatives on this thread.
If you want the support of a president, you need to make sure you run someone that people can look up to and admire.
Perhaps you should put that into recognizable english. I assume you are trying to say, that if I want you to support the president, I should run someone etc. Just who would that be, another sex maniac like Bill?
Let me ask you......do you think this is a president of outstanding quality and character? |
