Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: NickSE who wrote (83518)	3/19/2003 2:01:26 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) of 281500

I have a lot of doubts as to the veracity of the shredder story. If you were to shred a live human being, you would end up with a slurry. Not a consistency that would be suitable for bags. Much better to use a bucket as it would be easier to carry. Fish food is more unbelieveable. If we were talking about chunks of bodies, that I could believe. You can toss chunks of bodies to sharks. That works. Here you have human milk shake. Large fish [broad term] like sharks don't do milk shakes. Any of the small variety of fish that would eat human remains...you're still dealing with a material that wouldn't be consumable by a fish. All the blood, for example, would just contaminate a fish tank even a very large one. It's not consumable. jttmab

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next