Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 231.88

-0.3%

10:20 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: damniseedemons who wrote (154538)	3/21/2003 1:41:44 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (4) of 164684

I know the european byline was that Bush was after Iraqi oil. I never believed it... but now that I see absolutely no evidence of chemical weapons or WMDs and iraqis ambivalent about the entire exercise (they are not "giving up" in droves although they aren't exactly going down for their country either)... I believe now that the main motivation was indeed to break up OPEC. Not quite the same as the US taking over iraqi oilfields but the result as far as the US is concerned is basically the same. It also removes us from Saudi influence. There is a Bill Kristol commentary on the web somewhere that says essentially this, I am trying to find it. I am not in favor of this type of bullying, my view is we should spend huge dollars on one of the battery alternative fuel sources vs. waging any kind of war, anywhere for oil. I'm sure if we spent billions on alternative fuels, the same $$ that this war cost, we would prevail and solve the problem here at home.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next