SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Enterprise Informatics
EINF 0.5100.0%Sep 29 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jackhach who wrote (8988)3/21/2003 2:11:17 PM
From: Greg h2o  Read Replies (2) of 13797
 
<<Why are we still back at it now 12 years later -- when Bush Sr could have grabbed him and nobody else would have been a victim of this man's madnes. ...gee I wonder why?>>

could it be the failed UN, 12 years ago, only allowed the mandate to remove saddam from Kuwait? hmmmmm...i wonder. had we gone into baghdad at that time (without UN approval), people like you and the rest of the left(who were protesting the liberation of Kuwait) would have decried the action as unjust. do you remember how many dems voted on going into Kuwait and the amount of wrangling it took to get the dems in congress on board? how quickly we forget. do you remember, it was those same dems in 1998 that gave Clinton blessing to start lobbing bombs into iraq AFTER he sat back and watched the UN inspectors get kicked out? i wonder if it was just good policy. i mean, if the UN inspectors were so damned good and were doing their jobs, why did iraq want to kick them out? was it because they weren't scared of reprisals from Clinton? oh, sure. bomb a few aspirin factories and call it a day. they surely weren't hoarding any bio or chem weapons. surely they wouldn't attempt an assassination on a US president. surely they wouldn't PAY $25k to each suicide bombers families through hammas. get a grip.

<<I know the answer and unfortunately it would make most Americans sick to their stomachs -- or better yet -- they would just assume it untrue for it is too much for them to accept. >>
well, golllllly. please do tell. you're just so much smarter than the rest of us dumb ol' bible thumpin' red necks and hill billies in the rest of the country.

<<Greg, don't confuse critical thinking with elitism -- your backwater beliefs are getting the best of you. We in the Northeast are not elitist -- we are realist for the most part. We don't view the world down our noses -- we view it with both eyes and understand that to question your government is a direct indication of your concern and patriotism.>>
well, good thing they got half of your name correctly. to think that you, or anyone else in the "Northeast" have some sort leg up on the rest of the society is almost as laughable as saying i have "backwater beliefs". first, i was born in Ohio. second, i was raised a major city. i'm sure you've heard of, yet never visited it. it's called "Atlanta". you might want to write that name down, as that's where most of your friends are likely relocating to find a job. your degrading concept about anything outside of your little world borders on lunacy. maybe if you were as intelligent as you believe yourself to be, you'd not place double standards in most of the moral and political comments you make. oh, and trust me, i don't "confuse critical thinking with elitism". you have the latter, but not the former. try using some common sense instead of lame attempts at critical thinking.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext