SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Sonic Blue (SBLU)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ToolManInc who wrote (48)3/24/2003 9:41:12 AM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) of 57
 
There's probably enough "weasel" words in there to cover their posteriors. One could argue that bankruptcy is a "strategic alternative."

I would imagine the class action guys are looking at this and will judge based on a totality of the facts. For example, if there were some insider selling after your quoted statement, then that may be actionable. If there were other statements made to analysts that led investors to believe that shareholders would be in a better position over some future pattern, then there may some actionable claims.

But if you re-read what you wrote, there is nothing in there that gives any allegiance to shareholders. That's the thing that needs to be truly reformed. It's my belief that management works for shareholders and must be prevented from raping company when cash is available, only to abandon shareholders when times become tough.

I don't know enough about the history but if there is a history of over payments to management such that there amounted a breach of fiduciary duty to shareholders, then this may be actionable. Unfortunately, most of the class action guys for "cookie cutter" claims, the result being a few pennies for shareholders and millions in legal fees. They prefer that to "tough cases" that involve "real work."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext