SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (85678)3/24/2003 5:56:37 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
<Like I've told you guys before, it is true that you can have peace at the barrel of a gun. But you have to pull the trigger. And keep pulling it over and over. Until you kill 5% or so of the population.>

Maybe that's in a Kingdom, where the people identify with each other, a bit like Japan in WWII.

But in a place like Iraq, where the people don't especially identify with Saddam, perhaps Carl's Universal 5% would me much fewer. Perhaps the relevant 5% in that instance would be 5% of the Republican Guard. That would involve 5% of 100,000 = 20,000, which isn't many at all. Maybe even fewer than that in that few of them are fighting for something they believe in - just power.

I expect we might hear "Et tu Brutus?" as Brutus plunges his dagger into Saddam in an attempt to remain part of the new power play.

But I thought the Republican Guard [the Elite Division or whatever it's called] numbered only 20,000 or so. Which would mean only 1,000 need to be killed [if we accept Carl's theorem of decimation].

Decimation [meaning reducing by 10%, though the meaning is changed to something else these days] seems to be about the right number to complete a rout.

I'll go with a decimation as being the right proportion to obtain surrender.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext