SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (165552)3/25/2003 12:25:08 PM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (3) of 1583958
 
David. Re...The unbridled idealism that typifies liberalism can only be described as "child-like".

I can tell Ted won't like this article. I disagree somewhat with Israel in this also. Frankly, it should up to Israel to create a buffer on their land, if that is Israels plan. For instance. lets say your neighbor has a tree which drops some acorns. And if the wind is blowing right, some of these acorns can land on your prized petunias, knocking some petals off. You don't have the right to saw off his branches.. It would be your obligation to plant your petunias far enough back so they don't get hurt. In this case, Israel doesn't have the right to go on some one else's land, in another country, to knock down his house, to protect your property. Israel should move its houses back out of the way, so there is a buffer, and go through the courts to get redress, if the terrorist used his house to attack Israel. In other words, if Irael's solution is to have a buffer zone, then that buffer zone should reside on Israels land.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext