SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: StockDung who wrote (5505)3/26/2003 12:31:11 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (2) of 6847
 
You don't remember calling yourself an analyst? If someone analyzes stocks, publishes "press releases", assists in the publication or leaking of "news", then I think a trip to the dictionary may be on your agenda.

Remember Nixon said he wasn't a crook.

I've expressed my opinions on XYBR both pro and con many times over, fairly and accurately. If you review my posts on XYBR, just about all of my latest have been negative even though I think the product has potential. Management needs to be buying back rather than selling. How many times do I have to post that before you realize what I said. Perhaps reading 101 is also on your agenda.

As far as backing up goes, it doesn't take any intelligence to cut and paste immaterial stuff. You seem to think that the more you post, people will think you are bright no matter how irrelevant or moronic the post. Have you ever heard of "diarrhea of the mouth?" We may have to invent a new internet equivalent term.

But again, you are missing the point. You post over and over about people who manipulate or are alleged to have manipulated. Yet, you can't answer simple questions without trying to twist and turn and send vague counter allegations.

Did you have reason to believe that others would use your "research" as part of their trading before it was published? Did you have reason to know that you would be helping others "create volume" so that they could cover while minions would likely get stuck bottom shorting? Were you involved in InsideTruth? Was that name chosen to show your involvement? Did any direct or indirect consideration flow to you, whether contingent or liquidated or speculative?

Inquiring minds wish to know.

The mud is deep and you should look at your shoes.

PS There have been many times when I commended your research and analyses. I also did the same for A@P. I call them as I see them. You need to take a good look at your self image and realize that you could be doing a lot more good if you kept your ego in check. Amazing that you have a hard time learning from others' mistakes. Do you even read the stuff you post?

PPS Do the Feds sing "knock, knock, knocking on < > door?"
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext