"You refuse to ever see or understand someone's point of
view unless someone credible has written it before and
labeled it a fact."
That is quite inaccurate.
I am skeptical of all governmental officials. However, I
allow them the benefit of the doubt initially (as I do with
everyone I meet). As time passes, events evolve & reality
sets in; I consider their words, deeds & actions to base
my assessment of these people. I accept widely reported &
generally accepted information to be factual. If it can be
refuted with cold, hard fact, I am willing to change my
views as well. My posting history clearly supports this as
accurate.
Consider the post you are responding to. It shows clearly
your POV. I see it & I understand it clearly.
These are your own words. That is an undeniable fact.
I posted them here to give folks a chance to understand
your real POV because you were careful not to make your
most spiteful, hateful comments on this thread while we
continued our discussion. Your own words have objectively &
repeatedly defended the vile, hate mongering posts from
stockman_scott, Ray Duray & their peers.
I used widely reported, generally accepted factual
information to expose many of their hate mongering posts as
having their main thesis in lies, distortions, slanderous &
unsupportable allegations. At best, their overall POV was
wild, unsupportable speculation riddled with lies,
distortions & misinformation.
You know that is a factually accurate description of
events.
It is also a fact that you never questioned the accuracy or
authenticity of anything posted there. You never called
stockman_scott's relentless posting of this obvious
hate mongering into question even though he easily posted
10x more than I have there. Instead, you added to the
credibility of this massive hate mongering campaign with
your own words & articles that clearly supported
stockman_scott's & Ray Duray's POV.
On the other hand, it is a fact that you questioned what I
was doing a number of times even though I used reliable,
responsible media & governmental reports consistently. It
is a fact that you never once agreed that I had exposed
many outrageous lies, blatant distortions & obvious
disinformation. Instead you repeatedly labeled, in an
acceptable, supportive manner, what amounts to hate
mongering from these people.
What is clearly established is that you have not given
credibility to what I have done. You have though, through
your own words supported stockman_scott, Ray Duray & their
peers frequently.
That's a fact.
"You also put much too much effort into
correcting others opinions."
Another highly inaccurate statement.
It's a fact that I put far less effort into exposing lies,
distortions, slanderous, unsupportable allegations & what
amounts to a massive hate mongering campaign than a number
of folks on that thread & on SI. And consider that I make
every attempt at being accurate & truthful in what I say &
post. And consider that it takes very little time to post
lies, distortions & misinformation.
"I do not wish to get into any further arguments with you so
please do not post messages to me or about me."
You are free to ignore me if you wish. That certainly is
your right. I will not ignore you & I will respond to
anything you post at my own choosing, not yours. It is
solely my right to choose whom I speak to or about.
Ö¿Ö |
