SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: username who wrote (379661)3/26/2003 6:39:33 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
he has the wrong president wrt spouting off about a "quick war"

npr.org

Mar. 6, 2003 -- Former President Bill Clinton's latest conversation with NPR's Tavis Smiley began on the domestic front, with a plea to support historically black colleges and universities. But it didn't take long for the Iraq debate to come up.

Clinton made a case for giving U.N. arms inspectors more time to work, in light of Iraq's fledgling efforts to destroy long-range missiles. And he expressed concern about going forward without the support of traditional U.S. allies. But he made it clear he believes a war with Iraq would be quick and decisive.

"I wouldn't be opposed to our going in there if that was the only way to disarm him," Clinton said. "Obviously if he can be disarmed without war, that would be the best of all possible routes. I think that can be done and should be."

If conflict does come, Clinton said, he thinks a war could be "over in a week" because of what he sees as the overwhelming capability of U.S. forces and the depletion of Iraq's military strength.

"I think it's important to disarm this man, I think he's a bad fella, but our military superiority is so great -- it's far greater than it was in the Gulf War, and the Gulf War was over in 100 hours after we bombed for 43 days," Clinton said. "And so now they can bomb for a couple of days and then just roll into Baghdad. His military is less than half the strength it was 12 years ago and ours is more sophisticated and better and more modern.

"I think the real thing we have to worry about is whether we have enough support in the world so that it's obvious that we were implementing the human will and not doing a preemptive attack.

"From my perspective, if we have to go in there and kill a bunch of people to disarm him, well, we may have to do that," Clinton concluded. "But we can do that next week as well as today. So I would very much like to see... an effort made to get this thing done without conflict. It may or may not be possible. And I can't tell. The odds are there's going to be a war and it's going to be not for very long".
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext