Stop the War! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sojourner Smith who wrote (4207)	3/27/2003 10:13:06 PM
From: Doug R	Read Replies (1) of 21614

Ok...I'll go slow for you. There is a risk that China may see US control of ME oil as a threat to China's security and/or prospects for their modernization programs. IF they perceive a threat (that's all it takes now...just a perception of threat since PNAC got the pre-emption ball rolling) they may behave in such a way that becomes a perceived threat to the US. From there the possibilities of escalation to real and specific threats is no longer as far off as was prior to the pre-emption fad. My post was not addressing the Iraq invasion as a war for oil (I addressed that in other posts) it was addressing ME control of oil as a starting point for future bases of conflict. I think you would agree that future armed conflicts should be kept to a minimum?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next