Ariana is at it again....she's GOOD
Having Your Souffle And Eating It Too
Arianna Huffington
Wednesday 26 March 2003
For years now, political reformers have been railing against the unseemly -- and rampant --
practice of former government officials pouring through Washington's golden revolving door only to
return a short time later as well-paid lobbyists, auctioning off their access and influence.
Well, compared to the latest trend, turns out those were the good old days. Today's new breed of
public servants prefers to cash in while still stalking the halls of power and deeply involved in the
highest levels of creating public policy.
Talk about eating your cake and having it too.
On second thought, better make that "eating your soufflé," because Richard Perle -- a close
advisor to Don Rumsfeld whose side obsession has been to open a chain of souffle restaurants --
has taken this double-dipping scam to a whole new level.
As chairman of the Pentagon's influential Defense Policy Board -- a position that is unpaid but
still subject to government ethics rules -- Perle has been the frothing pit bull of the Bush
administration's dogs of war. At the same time, he is the managing partner of Trireme Partners, a
firm that specializes in homeland security and defense, and serves on the Board of Directors of
Autonomy, a software company whose clients include the Defense and Homeland Security
Departments.
Perle's latest deal finds him on the payroll of Global Crossing. The bankrupt telecommunications
company is struggling to win government approval for its proposed sale to Asian investors. The
Defense Department and the FBI are both opposed to the $250 million deal since it would place
Global's fiber optic network -- which is used by the U.S. government -- under the control of
Hutchison Whampoa, a Hong Kong firm with close ties to those freedom loving folks in Beijing.
Enter Richard Perle. Global is hoping he can convince his good buddies in the Defense
Department to put their national security concerns aside and let the dicey deal go through. And
Perle is clearly confident that he can deliver: In a highly unusual arrangement for a Washington
gun-for-hire, he's agreed to make $600,000 of his $725,000 fee contingent on his bringing home
the bacon.
I guess he figures: Hey, I convinced the president to toss aside 200 years of historical precedent
and launch a preemptive war despite the trepidation of the majority of the world, how hard can it
be to persuade a few government bureaucrats -- including my old pal Rummy -- to look the other
way while I do an end-run around the public interest and bank a quick 725 grand? After all, you
know what they say about casting Perles before swine.
This sleazy state of affairs has caught the eye -- and turned the stomach -- of Rep. John
Conyers, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, who has called on the
Defense Department to investigate whether Perle's business dealings constitute a conflict of
interest.
During his years in the Reagan administration, Perle was dubbed the Prince of Darkness
because of his hard-line stance on national security issues. But I suppose when you toss nearly
three-quarters of a million dollars into the mix, the gloomy Prince is more than happy to click on
his halogen nightlight and refashion his hard-line into a squiggle.
Adding insult to injury is the fact that Perle's windfall is coming from the coffers of a disgraced
company that was among the worst of the corporate crooks. He's lining his pockets at the
expense of the 10,000 laid-off Global employees who saw $32 million in severance pay wiped out
-- and the shareholders who lost $57 billion in equity -- when the company declared bankruptcy.
The hubris is unfathomable. In legal documents drafted in connection with the proposed Global
sale, Perle couldn't have been clearer about what the telecom company would be buying with its
fat fee. "As chairman of the Defense Policy Board," declared Perle in an affidavit, "I have a unique
perspective on and intimate knowledge of the national defense and security issues" likely to be
raised by the governmental review of the sale. Knowledge, he pointedly pointed out, "that is not
and could not be available" to the other lobbyists trying to get the deal approved.
In other words: "I've got Rumsfeld's ear and access to all sorts of super-top secret information
that none of these other jokers on your payroll do. I know more. I can do more. So I'm worth
more." And he had the unmitigated chutzpah to put this all in writing. And sign it. I guess this is
what the Bush administration means by "transparency." And, to Perle’s credit, the whole thing is
pretty transparent.
But, of course, when reporters began sniffing around the deal, Perle's power plumage shriveled up
faster than George in the "shrinkage" episode of Seinfeld.
First he tried the classic Bush administration Plan A -- the simple, 180 degree lie. He just told
reporters that he never signed the statement. That didn’t work, so onto Plan B -- claiming
ignorance, admitting that he had signed it but insisting he hadn’t read it. Finally, no doubt
realizing this all sounded a bit too much like "the dog ate my affidavit," Perle declared that none
of it mattered anyway, since his position on the DPB actually, now that you mention it, had
"nothing to do" with the Global deal -- so how could he possibly be using his public office for
private gain?
So when there's money to be had, Perle's position at the Defense Policy Board affords him "a
unique perspective" on advising Global Crossing, but when ethical questions are raised, his
Defense Policy Board post has "nothing to do" with his work for the telecom company.
And this is the guy our president is putting his trust in when it comes to waging war on Iraq?
Perle's abuse of the public interest is in a class by itself, but he is far from the only one in
Washington shaping public policy from the inside while skirting the ethics rules designed to keep
people from cashing in on their positions of power.
Among the most prominent of the double-dippers are Karen Hughes, who continues to serve as
one of the president's most trusted advisers while pulling in $15,000 a month as a "consultant" to
the Republican National Committee; RNC Chairman Marc Racicot, a double-dip pioneer, who
famously decided to forgo tradition after being elected party chairman in 2002 and hang on to his
day job as a high-powered corporate lobbyist for companies such as Enron; and Haley Barbour,
the former head of the RNC, who has unabashedly decided to continue working as a lobbyist for
clients such as Citigroup, DamierChrysler, Lockheed Martin, and Nestle at the same time he is
running for Governor of Mississippi.
It seems that after failing in their attempts to privatize social security, Republicans have decided
to privatize public service. |
