Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (87269)	3/28/2003 11:28:58 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (3) of 281500

> Bush rhetoric would tend to undermine the divisions of reformer against mullah It does. But it does so by giving the hardliners the upper hand since now they can show that the reformers have little to show. > the notion of Iran and Syria coming to the aid of Saddam...strikes me as extraordinarily unlikely It is not "aiding Saddam" that they'd be after but opposing US. On other threads some people have been questioning why it has not happened already. They argue that if you know you are going to be next, why wait to be picked one at a time? I find it unlikely on the Iranian part (but not necessarily the Syrians), because Iran is more secure about its position. As well, before Bush can go after anyone else, he has to succeed in Iraq (and I don't mean just military success). Iran is betting that it is not going to happen before Bush is out and the next admin will not fallow on Bush's footsteps. ST

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next