Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (87603)	3/29/2003 9:21:24 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Back to armchair war strategy Bill. What if strategy is changed and we consolidate the victories in the south, west and north? The liberation of basrah will play well for us when it occurs. I know we had been looking to decaptitate the snake, but there might be too high a price to pay. But when 80% of irag is under coalition control and Tikit has fallen(two-three weeks out) saddam will be the president of bagdad only. Seriously though, with the Republican guards backed into bagdad and if we not firing on bagdad at all, it might force saddam to try to take the initiative and move them out to attack our forces. And/or a siege of badgad with us allowing food in, and perhaps we are the one to send the flowers. Obviously this is not the current plan. I have no idea if it has any merit. Just struck me that it may be a more traditional approach of taking territory with the last stop bagdad which at that point may just fall of its own weight or the weight of republican guard forces fed up and not willing to commit futher suicide. I still think the complete liberation of Basrah should be the #1 task regardless of any overall change of strategy. Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next