SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Photography, Digital including Point and Shoot

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: BirdDog who wrote (271)3/29/2003 12:30:45 PM
From: Done, gone.Read Replies (1) of 4530
 
I think I'll simply ask them to come to me for the file to send to printer...that way the least amount will be lost due to re-saving.

I face this situation on a daily basis, and took me a long time to "let go."

I would not sweat any info lost due to re-saving, as long as the image file is not being altered as such. In other words, just because I copy the file, then someone else copies it, and so on, does not cause any image data loss. Only if one makes a change within the file, then saves again will the jpeg compression data loss problem kick in.

For reproduction I'm asked to hand over 300 DPI files, image size 10 inches on the long side, saved as jpegs, Quality Medium (5), Format Baseline ("Standard"). I'm told more than that is useless to supply because the output printers cannot "see" more.

Doing great (knocking on wood), thanks for asking! Yes, theater is getting squeezed like everything else, but seems my clients know that a good publicity snap can fill a thousand seats, so I'm clicking on until they find someone who can do it better cheaper. (g)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext