Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sajjad who wrote (87884)	3/30/2003 10:16:28 AM
From: Sun Tzu	Read Replies (3) of 281500

> am sure that America has no intentions of becoming the occupier Of course not. That would bring about massive American casualties. > As a stated policy, America wants to be the liberator. As a stated policy America is also committed to expansion of democracy by restoring regimes like Kuwait and supporting others like Saudi and Egypt. What is your point? > We are part of a bigger coalition, that cannot be given a bad wrap unless something disastrous happens for the world to see. Well we'll try that but it won't fly. It would have been different if we were part of a UN or even NATO force. As it stands, we just said we're gonna to do this no matter what, who's gonna be with us and who's gonna be against us. So the PR above won't fly. > US forces do not intend to occupy the area for an indefinite period of time. Correction. US hopes not to be occupying for an indefinite period of time. Your crystal ball must be working differently than mine. Because last I checked the troops we sent to Saudi some 12 years ago are still there.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next