Stop the War! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Vitas who wrote (6338)	4/1/2003 11:59:58 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) of 21614

Even if force were "implicit", force contrary to the body that authorized the language that is now being interpreted as authorizing force, is obviously not allowable. If my local police department has a citizen member on a committee, and if that committee votes they may use all measures necessary to destroy a certain crack house, that does NOT mean that citizen member can go blow up the crack house without the approval of the other members of the committee. I don't know how you could figure one member of a UN council could do that. It makes absolutely no sense- and we certainly wouldn't stand for it if the Russians or Chinese did that sort of thing. We'd be screaming to high heaven about how they didn't follow procedure, and how they violated the integrity of the UN.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next