SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Night Trader who wrote (30623)4/2/2003 7:55:58 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) of 74559
 
I've read that piece by Fumento every time a serious discussion of SARS gets started.

I think he's wrong about the death rate from the Spanish Influenza outbreak in 1919. It wasn't 30% in the US, it was 3%-4%, like SARS, but there were no ventilators then. SARS has a 4% death rate for people on ventilators. US patients are getting ventilators, ribavarin and interferon, but what about the Third World? Or the Second World, for that matter?

People who die of SARS have hemorrhages in their lungs. Ordinary influenza doesn't cause hemorrhages in the lungs. But then, ordinary influenza only kills .1%.

"Don't panic" is good advice, but "don't worry" isn't.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext