SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Gliatech (GLIA)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Micawber who wrote (1992)4/3/2003 8:14:43 PM
From: John Metcalf   of 2001
 
The attorneys get a third of the $4.5mm, or is that netted out?

Seems to me that the proper action would be against the attorneys who represented the class, if they have not pursued a just and equitable settlement. To me, "just" would mean criminal referrals where warranted. "Equitable" would mean that the owners get all available funds plus recovery of funds received by management after the time they breached fiduciary duty to shareholders. Of course, I'm not an attorney, but I do speak English.

I don't have a class notice yet, though I still own shares.

If class-action barristers are monitoring this thread, I love you guys. C'mon down; let's go hunting.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News