>> the website you point to is a riot. <<
emile simply re-posted the link i gave. it was not his link. i didn't think you could get the original from the washington times for free, and i didn't want to post a link that you had to pay for so i randomly took the next one in my search. i had never been to that website before and that article is the only thing i have ever seen there.
anyway, i found a link to the original washington times article
-----> so now what is your excuse for ignoring the facts, now that i have found you the original? <-----
Army study suggests U.S. force of 20,000
asp.washtimes.com
Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The Army's School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS), an elite training ground and think tank at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., produced the study last year. The 68-page paper tells how the major operation would be run the first year, with peacekeepers stationed in Gaza, Hebron, Jerusalem and Nablus.
One major goal would be to "neutralize leadership of Palestine dissenting factions [and] prevent inter-Palestinian violence."
..........................................................................
It calls the Israeli armed forces a "500-pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza [and the West Bank]. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission. Very unlikely to fire on American forces."
On the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the Army study says, "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." |
