Stop the War! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stop the War!

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doug R who wrote (8286)	4/6/2003 12:00:22 AM
From: Sojourner Smith	Read Replies (1) of 21614

If Saddam disagreed with their approach, he could have easily had them removed, instead he funded them as the article states. The reporter rightfully claims he cannot verify any of the information. How could he unless he was working with Saddam or was a CIA agent. Like I said before no amount of information will convince you. Not even the UN inventory of Saddam's wmd. You choose to believe Saddam's statements that he destroyed all the wmd. Foolish considering it has been proven many times he has lied. Best example was nuclear program, where his son-in-law exposed it. Again you believe his Saddam over his son-in-law. Then Saddam said that he would never harm the father of his grandchildren. His son-in-law was shot down soon after he returned. AND YOU BELIEVE SADDAM!!! Believe him, go be a human shield.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next