SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (53598)4/6/2003 10:25:32 PM
From: rkral  Read Replies (1) of 64865
 
OT ... Lizzie, re "I'll bet if you look very hard at where those options went in the years you cite... the majority went to 5 or so guys at the top (just a guess, I think I'm right though)."

I cited the last two fiscal years, FY01 and FY02. ORCL options generally vest ratably over four years. Per SFAS 123, options need not be expensed before vesting, so the last 25% of the options granted in 1997 probably weren't expensed until FY01.

For fiscal years '97 through '01, the top five executives received 46%, 3%, 14%, 21%, and 0%, respectively. The numbers for 1997 and 2000 are high due to unusually large grants to Mr. Lane and Mr. Ellison, respectively.

In no year is the percentage greater than 50%. Therefore, contrary to your guess, it appears mathematically impossible for the "majority" of options to have gone "to 5 or so guys at the top". (Proxies do not include details about options to executives below the top 5, so it's pointless to go there, IMO.)

Ron
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext