SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)
AMZN 227.14+0.5%10:17 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (155686)4/10/2003 9:54:07 PM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (1) of 164684
 
Lizzie maybe everybody already believes what they believe, and no amount of new information or anything else will change anyone's viewpoint. Maybe the war was inevitable, and maybe so was Hans' failure to get the job done.

maybe this whole thing is being produced and filmed on a hollywood lot, and in the Mojave Desert.

In any case, it looks like the underground portion of this Tuwaitha facility is what's new. The above-ground part of it was already known to the IAEA. (But let's be careful- Assoc Press is probably making this up too.. )

"David Kay, a former IAEA chief nuclear inspector, said Thursday that the teams he oversaw after the 1991 Gulf War never found an underground site at Tuwaitha despite persistent rumors.

"But underground facilities by definition are very hard to detect," he said. "When you inspect a place so often, you get overconfident about what you know. It would have been very easy for the inspectors to explain away any excessive radiation at Tuwaitha. The Iraqis could have hidden something clandestine in plain sight."
boston.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext