SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (MLNM)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: software salesperson who wrote (1465)4/15/2003 8:39:19 PM
From: microcapfun  Read Replies (1) of 3044
 
Thanks, sales. I am always a few days behind in listening at the cc's.

Two questions.

1. 30.8 collaborative revenue was on budget; the current decrease was because of conclusion of Monsanto deal.

That is surely the main contribution, but it doesn't seem to explain it all. Monsanto generated $42.4M revenues for MLNM last year with the collaboration ending in Q4, and $44.3M in 2001. Assume $11M in revs from MLNM Q1 2002. Subtract that from Q1 2002 collaborative revenues of $46.5M and you get $35.5M. MLNM had $30.8M in collaborative revenues Q1 2003. So MLNM was 'light' $4.7M Q1 2003. Why?

Is it just a timing issue, perhaps associated with the $40M in annual Campath-related money from ILEX, or are they not delivering as many targets as they did last year? The targets are associated with milestones.

This is a medium-sized red flag for me.

2. I am unclear whether the 2003 revenue guidance of $450M - $475M includes money from the Velcade partnership. Does anyone know - perhaps by looking up some old cc notes? I am not referring to Velcade sales, mind you, but partnership funding. It was stated that there would be upfront funding associated with the partnership, and MLNM could book that as revenue.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext