Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lou Weed who wrote (93970)	4/16/2003 5:31:14 PM
From: paul_philp	Read Replies (1) of 281500

wouldn't we be breaking a peace treaty with Iraq by imposing a no-fly zone and routinely bombing targets in that zone for those 12 years No. Read the document. Play with the words whatever way you want Paul.....the fact Russia, Germany, China and France are openly opposed gives credence to the fact that 1441 cannot be seen as an approval by the UNSC. No. If the UNSC didn't mean serious consequences, it shouldn't have said serious consequences. There was no debate about the meaning of 'serious consequences', the diplomatic language was quite clear). I, of course, am just as happy to imagine that UN denounced the War, argued to prevent it, actively worked to undermine US military success because it shows the UN for the silly meaningless bureaucracy that it was. On this one I get to eat my cake and kill it too. Paul

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next