SUPPORT OUR TROOPS Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : SUPPORT OUR TROOPS

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Thomas M. who wrote (2002)	4/17/2003 3:03:17 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (2) of 3592

The only theory I know that makes sense of the events is that the troops were ordered not to prevent looting of the government ministries. The reason for this order was to be sure that the locals who had not fled would not be able to setup an interim government quicker than the U.S. wanted. The bombing had not destroyed all that much of the infrastructure, and so looting was used to dismantle any chance of a functioning bureacracy. Where infrasture still exists local leaders appeared quickly. See for example: news.ft.com During the first day of looting it was reported to be all young men. It's easy to speculate that agent provacatures were in the initial wave, to more or less show the general population that the troops would not respond. Once the chairs and desks and papers were gone there would be no functioning civil authority until the U.S. had it's chance to put the puppets in place. The museums and libraries were then more of an accident in the general order to not defend any government buildings outside the oil ministry. TP

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next