SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Moderate Forum

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Thomas M. who wrote (397)4/18/2003 11:57:43 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) of 20773
 
Thomas, I intentionally included that one passage. It was
but one POV from one report that still supports my POV more
than yours. Since Saddam took power, the disparity between
his supporters & the vast majority of Iraqi's began to
deteriorate. That is widely reported, widely documented &
widely accepted as true.

The argument that the sanctions are the fault of the US is
akin to saying you are at fault for the incarceration of
the criminal who robbed you & beat you nearly to death
because you pressed charges against the criminal. Saddam
failed to meet the requirements of the cease fire
agreement. It was Saddam's choice to fail to comply with
international law. And it was the UN passed those
sanctions, not the US.

BTW, the Oil for Food program should have fed & provided
medicine for all of Iraq's needy. Instead it went to build
more palaces. It fed & bought weapons for Iraqi Republican
Guard. It enriched senior Iraq leaders & Ba'ath leaders as
well as Saddam. I guess that also was the fault of the Bush
Administration?

I notice that you completely ignored every other report &
the hundreds of others easily available to you that clearly
prove my point to be accurate & yours to be bunk.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext