PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (395253)	4/20/2003 8:14:05 AM
From: George Coyne	Read Replies (2) of 769669

Yo, Ray Duhray, Nice use of bold and random repetition! Here is an article by someone who basically agrees with your source, but is, IMO, much more reasonable. philly.com So why would such weapons not have been used in the regime's final stand? "The order most likely would have had to come from Saddam himself," said Zumwalt, who is now a lawyer in Washington. "With command and control disrupted, and with the threat of war-crimes prosecution, lower-level officers may not have dared to use them." Zumwalt ranks the chance that Hussein somehow destroyed the stockpiles on his own "about nil." It wouldn't make sense. Hussein weathered more than a decade of crippling sanctions because he refused to disarm. He complained bitterly about them. How likely is it that he would have endured the sanctions if he had, in fact, destroyed the very weapons that were their cause? What purpose would be served by allowing the world to believe he still had the arsenals?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next