SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SARS - what next?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Maurice Winn who wrote (194)4/21/2003 11:02:35 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (2) of 1070
 
Cumulative deaths. x = 10 deaths.
26 Feb ?
..5 Mar x
12 Mar x
19 Mar x
26 Mar xx
...2 Apr xxxxx
...9 Apr xxxxxxxxxx
.16 Apr xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.23 Apr xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxe [actual 217 to 21 April, e = estimate 230]

who.int

% recovered doesn't make sense. In China, 60% have recovered, whereas in Hong Kong, only 31% have recovered. That probably means that China has reported cases which weren't actually Sars. Perhaps common influenza which resolved as normal.

China's %mortality compared with those infected = 6%
Hong Kong's %mortality compared with those infected = 7%

The numbers don't match for some reason. 60% vs 30% is a huge difference and not explained by China having suffered the infection for a longer period of time. Maybe China has younger people with fewer health problems.

Canada's 9% mortality of those infected is huge!! They were 80% elderly and unwell people, as per previous posts, so that would explain that excessive mortality rate.

It seems that old people are going to be killed in hordes around the world if the infectious diseases experts are right that the chance to kill the bug off has been lost. China seems to be the main problem. Other countries aren't getting runaway infection.

Singapore also has a high %mortality, 9%.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext