SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 267.16-0.4%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Sun Tzu who wrote (69902)4/22/2003 3:58:08 PM
From: chomolungma  Read Replies (2) of 70976
 
That is not how I read Roach's article:

Roach said "The only way out of this trap, in my view, is for a long overdue global rebalancing — less growth in the United States and more growth elsewhere around the world. Unfortunately, there are no signs that such a rebalancing is in the cards."

I don't want to put words in his mouth, but I honestly don't think he meant that lower U.S. growth is a good thing. As was pointed out elsewhere in the article, what he wants is the U.S. to carry less of the growth in demand. In other words, more growth from Europe, Japan, Latin America, etc.

What I was saying is that as America's trade gap closes, due to a lower dollar, and a shift to U.S. producers happens, that demand will fall elsewhere. When faced with this reality, how will foreign governments respond? Will they sit and let their economies fall (further) into recession? Perhaps, but I don't think so. Their inflation rates are so low and the slack in their labor force is so great that they will be free (forced) to stimulate. This is a good thing. They have been hooked on U.S. demand too long and now it's time they broke the habit.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext