<<<At least 7 of the "Arabs" identified as the 9/11 suicide attackers are alive and well, and were the victims of
identity theft.
Why would this indicate a massive conspiracy by the US government against its own people? Terrorists might not find it useful to steal and use someone else's identity?>>>
So, show us the comprehensive US investigation into the identities of the hijackers. The official account still lists the "terrorists" as the names they used to board the planes, even though official accounts acknowledge at least 7 of the identities were false. To date, there have been no claims by terrorists of responsibility for the attacks, and bin Laden flatly denies any connection. Why would a Saudi attempting to cover his tracks with phoney IDs pick the identity of another Saudi? Wouldn't that be kind of dumb? Of course if someone wanted to penetrate an extremist group in order to guide their activities, a Saudi passport would be the only way to fly. Regardless of any theories that could be formed based on the evidence, the glaring defect is the lack of an investigation.
<<<On September 10, a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly cancelled travel plans for the next morning,
apparently because of security concerns.
Where were they travelling to, by what means? If they weren't on one of the flights involved, why bother?>>>
A better question is which "top Pentagon officials" cancelled their plans, and why if they were concerned for their own safety, they didn't bother to warn anyone else? Of course, it might just have been the result of an itchy feeling in the middle of their backs which caused them to abandon their plans because they had a "hunch" that the morning of September 11, 2001 was a good time to take a bit of time off from routine travel plans. Then again being grounded in mid route would be inconvenient at best and being shot down by an over eager fighter pilot would be undesirable at worst. Once again, no names are released, no investigation takes place, no one was warned, and no one knows why.
<<<On 9/11, Bush is filmed reading stories to children. He doesn't blink an eye when notified America is being attacked. His response to a national emergency is to continue reading.
Was he told at that moment there was a national emergency, that America was under attack? Or was he told an airplane
was believed to have hit the WTC?>>>
It's almost conceivable that the leader of the most powerful nation on earth might not stop the presses to respond to a report of an airplane crash. Just maybe the publicity of promoting education would take precedence over an "accident" involving a building housing the heart of America's financial district and a large CIA complex. A little hard to imagine, but not impossible. Bush was reading stories when THE SECOND PLANE HIT THE WTC. He was being filmed when he was notified of the strike by Andy Card. He was CAUGHT ON TAPE DOING NOTHING!!! Not responding to one plane going off course and hitting the WTC is hard to imagine, but just barely possible. Not responding to TWO planes hitting the WTC is absolutely unbelievable, especially when it was known by that time that several other planes were off course.
emperors-clothes.com
<<<I'd like to see the reference for the quote from Sharon, and its context.>>>
See item #11. toward the bottom third of the page.
whatreallyhappened.com
You may also find these sites interesting:
flight93crash.com
home.attbi.com
You're welcome to view the conclusions reached by the authors as "theory" if it makes you feel better, but the evidence on which they base their theories is well documented. When Timothy McVey bombed the WTC there was a full investigation and a public trial. When 19 mystery guests completely destroy the WTC, mum's the word. If the Bush administration is totally innocent of any involvement in the incident, why not a full investigation that ties all the loose ends into a neat little package, instead of a cover up.
If average citizens are able to dig up this much information, without an army of police and secret service agents, and on shoe string budgets, what is the FBI doing? |
