SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maceng2 who wrote (32234)4/23/2003 9:09:55 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (1) of 74559
 
PB,

Re: The Times of London --

I seemed to recall it was Murdock who owns it. Thanks for the confirmation.

There was an interesting moment on C-SPAN's Washington Journal this morning (Wednesday, 4/23/03) when the subject of free speech was being discussed.

c-span.org

The caller described a court decision in Florida (where else?) where a news reporter was fired by a local Fox affiliate for failing to read a "news story" that she knew to be patently false. She was fired for insubordination. She sued, and lost her case. The court ruled that Fox/Murdock was protected by the free speech provisions of the First Amendment to be able to lie to the public and that the truth was not a valid argument for the plaintiff.

God Bless America!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Or should I say, "Gawd Help Amerika!"?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext