but added that my differences were as a result of a lack of knowledge. But I forgive you <gggg>
Didn't mean it as an insult. Differences of opinion is one thing and you know by now that I don't mind that. But differences in perception as to the realities of the Middle East are a different matter. Without meaning to look arrogant, I would like to point out that my understanding of the region is perhaps closer to reality than most on SI as someone who has lived in the Middle East for a very long time, speaking the local language and interacting with the people.
This was what you said:
the obviously well-staged protests are significant but don't represent the majority of Iraqi citizens
Message 18878318
The perceptions (not opinions) you stated here, which I feel are based on inadequate knowledge about the region are:
(1) Referring to the march to Karbala, THE most important religious manifestation of the Shiites, as "protests".
(2) Thinking they are "well-staged", whereas they are not staged at all. People go through similar motions, because that is what the ritual is, not because they rehearsed it.
(3) Thinking the Shiites you see in these images are not the majority.
what a Mideast nation says in the press is not necessarily what is says in private
What do you mean by "what a ME nation says in private"?
The leaders are jumping, the people are struggling to find some food.
Question: Do you think Iraqis were starving, for example?
Saddam's beliefs, character traits and history are relevant to how he would rule
We already SAW how he rules. We hardly need analyses of his character to figure THAT out :-)
Bush wanted him out because he was the longest reigning somewhat powerful tyrant, with continuing potential to harm millions of his own people and his neighbors through a multitude of resources.
Interesting. Why do you think that is the case, considering the fact that there are other tyrants (some capable of nuclear holocaust) about which they don't seem concerned one little bit? |
