SARS - what next? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SARS - what next?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (255)	4/24/2003 7:56:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 1070

CB, I suppose the differences will be due to many variables. For example, Chinese smoke a lot more than Americans. Smoking damages lungs and makes any additional problem less survivable. So that'll be one variable. Japanese smoke heaps, but women don't [presumably that applies to Chinese women too]. Therefore, on the smoking variable, there should be more men than women in China dying of Sars. Epidemiologists must be happy as pigs in mud with Sars. What a great opportunity to practise their talents and with something that is of vital importance to people. It's more fun than looking for a needle in a haystack with things such as the effect of using CDMA2000 phones on brain cancer rates [the risk must be so close to zero that the cost of the studies probably exceeds the cost of the cancers]. Over-reaction will be economically disastrous, and might cause a LOT more damage than the disease. Under-reaction would be catastrophic. A few years ago I bought an excellent mask, complete with full face protection. I am looking forwards to wearing it downtown one of these days. I wonder if the price of them has gone up. I'm thinking of starting a mask export business. A big, cheesy, smile on the mask. Or, "Lift mask to Kiss Me". Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next