<<<You obviously have a thing towards Israel even though it directly refutes the theory of this board.>>>
That's the silliest thing you've said yet. 9/11 was too big an operation to hide before the fact and it took a ton of government cover to prevent the operation from being derailed. If you want the "theory" wrapped up in a neat little package which includes ALL the evidence, it goes like this:
The Carlyle cartel in conjunction with Bush oil and energy campaign contributors presented a program to gain control of Iraqi oil reserves. The program required at least some public support or justification for what amounted to armed robbery. The Zionist members of the Bush administration were in line with Israeli interests in creating chaos in the Middle East. Radical Muslim elements were allowed to enter the US where they were joined by Mossad agents posing as Arabs who were then able to guide the operation from the inside. Bush was probably led to believe casualties would be fairly light by picking a time when occupancy levels on the chosen flights would be small and by picking targets engineered to be mostly crash proof. Israeli concerns had access to the WTC and to security at the chosen airports. Remote controlled explosive devices were planted on the flights as a failsafe, to abort the mission if it became necessary, as in the case of Flight 93. Demolition charges were placed in the WTC to insure a level of destruction that may have been in excess of the original plan. Anthrax from Ft. Detrick was mailed in 4 letters to opposition leaders and the press, along with placebos to increase the level of terror, in order to create widespread public horror at the prospect of biological attacks. At that point Bush became the ultimate blackmail victim in the history of the world, and when Ariel Sharon says he owns America, he isn't blowing hot air. Bush concerns will make the kind of immense wealth they dreamed of, and America becomes Sharon's wrist hawk to attack any target he chooses, regardless of the cost in blood and money to the American public. The Bush conspirators then destroyed as much evidence as they were able, classified what they couldn't destroy as top secret, and took steps to make sure no independent investigation would take place.
So, if you want the current theory behind this board, I suggest you refer to the person who started the thread. If you have an alternate theory to propose, which covers all the facts, I heartily invite you to present it. That was the sole reason for my picking an unmoderated forum; so all participants would feel free to express their views regardless of whether or not they coincided with my own.
So far all you've managed to do is waste a lot of bandwidth to say you disagree with virtually every view presented, which I believe most of us could have figured out with your first post. If you honestly believe many of the expressed views are wrong, then obviously you must have formed some sort of opinion which you believe to be the correct one.
I respectfully suggest you present your view, along with whatever supporting evidence (no matter how credible or incredible) you feel you may need to state your case. If you are able to present a solid case for whatever view you may hold, I'd honestly like to see it. Who knows, if it is convincing enough, you might find those who agrees with you, or even those who will embrace your view in favor of their own. |