<To date, not one world leader, not Putin, not Chirac, not Schroeder, not even Cretien, has taken the position that Iraq did not have WMD.>
See my post earlier, about proving negatives.
I guess this is another issue, in which contortionist mental gymnastics are required by Hawks, to support their position. Logical absurdities, ignoring evidence, violating Occam's Razor, redefining words, unreasonable assumptions, asking people to prove negatives, and so on.
France hasn't stated they are certain Iraq doesn't have WMD. And you take that as proof that Iraq did have WMD.
<statement that the intelligence agencies of all major nations reported that Iraq had WMD>
I missed that. Have a link? |
