SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ilaine who wrote (96304)4/25/2003 8:08:01 PM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
IF she has found out, then she must have had good proof. But I can assure you that she would not be presuming me guilty on anything short of absolute proof.

The premise of your question is wrong. You are implying that there is enough evidence to prove him a Saddam stooge. I am saying I find it unlikely but possible. However, if this is true, then he should be prosecuted for treason. Until that court has not found him guilty, it is wrong to "discuss" the idea because it taints his most valuable possession, his name.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News