For starters, the five dancing agents...
There's that word again, which raises the yet-unanswered question: what evidence is there that these people were "agents"?
...and Urban Moving Inc.
Redux: Message 18883974
Keep in mind that in any investigation everyone is a suspect.
That's true; and it's particularly curious that while you'd say that, all I've heard out of you focuses upon five Israelis. Strange.
Why do you readily point the finger to a caveman while excluding others?
Where have I pointed a finger at, or necessarily excluded, anyone?
Why was the president so quick (within 5 hours of crash) to point the finger at OBL?
I don't know. Do you?
One would assume that the only reason they pointed the finger at OBL so quickly is that government had intelligence information against him. One would presume that this information might have come from a double agent or some insider source close to OBL. OTOH, if they had such a source, why didn't they react prior to the crashes?
You're talking to a libertarian, not a conspiracy theorist; therefore, those arguments will actually find purchase with me, but only in the sense that they accurately reflect the danger of lumbering governmental bureaucracies which, amidst the bloat, have lost their effectiveness.
Other than that, I'm going to need a little less emotional sizzle and far more evidentiary steak.
LPS5 |
