Ask Michael Burke Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: benwood who wrote (98685)	4/29/2003 1:54:37 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Read Replies (1) of 132070

ben, we'll see how the numbers work out. i agree more supply equals a lower price unless opec fixes the price and iraq follows opec. i just don't think it will be that drastic. i could be wrong. this war was not as simple as "a pre-emptive attack." there is nothing in this administration that says they support that simple approach. if that were the case, we'd be fighting nearly everyone. but we don't. iraq had a unique history and failed to work with the world for about 12 years. not 1 year. not 2 years. not 3 years... you get the idea. now, if they go and start attacking other countries that pose a threat but have taken no proven direct action (syria or north korea) then i'll admit to being wrong. until then, though, you are merely speculating - and doing so in the most negative light possible, imho. ps - what are your thoughts on the documented al queda link? pss - what are your thoughts on france giving away confidential US information re: the war to iraq?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next