SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Skeeter Bug who wrote (98687)4/29/2003 2:48:17 PM
From: benwood  Read Replies (2) of 132070
 
If I'm not mistaken, OPEC does not set prices, but rather targets prices and sets production quotas.

I didn't think the war was a preemptive attack at all, but rather part of the stated foreign policy of beginning a makeover of the middle east. It was couched as a pre-emptive attack however. Having a pre-emptive policy does not mean you attack everybody -- I'm sure they still look for bang for buck.

The Al Qaida link -- doesn't sound like there's much to it, yet. Will wait and see. In the Guardian, guardian.co.uk they quote "We are aware of fleeting contacts [between Baghdad and al-Qaida] in the past, but there were were no long-term official contacts," a well-placed source told the Guardian yesterday. "The documents do not take things further forward"

France -- I remember reading something about this, but oddly have searched three newspapers and cannot find an article about it. I suspect it is either unimportant or inaccurate. If you happen to have a link I would appreciate it.

edit: for what it's worth, somebody (like France) should not be punished for dissenting; in this case, I think France should be punished for a flawed process at the UN and for their acting bigger than their britches. But I think the US process was flawed as well.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext