Moderate Forum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (816)	4/29/2003 5:08:08 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) of 20773

No it's NOT being personal. Perhaps you TOOK it personally, but I did not imply there was anything wrong with you, merely that I didn't like what you were saying. You, on the other hand, chose to insult me. That's personal- and I'm not going to stand for it. I didn't say you would prefer the KGB. I simply said, imo, that if you wanted armed men confronting people eating dinner on small pretexts, the KGB are the folks for you- I suppose I could have said Colombian drug lord thugs as well, or death squads in any country. Now you get personal AGAIN. You obviously think my post was personal but it was not. Read it again. Then read YOURS. "hysterical"=personal "There was a time I thought you had some intelligence. Why are you so insistent on proving me wrong?" =personal "Are you so desperate for people to post to that your only way to communicate is to attack somebody so absurdly that you hope they just can't ignore your attack?" = personal You were not attacked- merely disagreed with. You may have thought the argument was absurd, but you made the choice to attack the poster and not the argument- AGAIN. Your choice. Made by you. Again.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next