1993 - [Phenserine][physostigmine derivative]
1: Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1993;112(4):415-20 Related Articles, Links
Phenserine: a physostigmine derivative that is a long-acting inhibitor of cholinesterase and demonstrates a wide dose range for attenuating a scopolamine-induced learning impairment of rats in a 14-unit T-maze.
Iijima S, Greig NH, Garofalo P, Spangler EL, Heller B, Brossi A, Ingram DK.
Molecular Physiology and Genetics Section, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224.
Phenserine ((-)-N-phenylcarbamoyl eseroline), a carbamate analog of physostigmine (Phy), is a long-acting inhibitor of cholinesterase. We have assessed the potential clinical value of phenserine for cholinomimetic therapy of cognitive impairments associated with aging and Alzheimer's disease by evaluating its duration of in vivo activity against rat plasma acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and its effect on attenuating a scopolamine-induced impairment in learning performance of young rats in a shock-motivated 14-unit T-maze. Phenserine achieved maximum AChE inhibition of 73.5% at 5 min and maintained a high and relatively constant inhibition for more than 8 h. For analysis of effects on learning performance, 69, 3-month-old male Fischer-344 rats were pretrained in a straight runway to avoid electric footshock. On the following day, each animal received 15 trials in the 14-unit T-maze. Sixty minutes prior to the maze training, each rat received the first IP injection of either vehicle (Tween 80, ethanol and 0.9% NaCl) or phenserine at 1.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 7.5, or 10.0 mg/kg. Then 30 min prior to the training, each animal received a second IP injection of either 0.9% NaCl or scopolamine hydrochloride (0.75 mg/kg; SCOP). Compared to the vehicle-SCOP group, all but the 7.5 mg/kg dose of phenserine significantly ameliorated error performance, runtime, shock frequency and shock duration in SCOP-treated rats at the final block of three trials. Appearing to have a long effect and a wide therapeutic window, phenserine deserves further study as a cognitive enhancer.
PMID: 7871051 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
An aside -
physostigmine?
[2001]
A substantive amendment to this systematic review was last made on 26 February 2001. Cochrane reviews are regularly checked and updated if necessary
Main results: Fifteen studies were included using four different methods of administration of physostigmine. Four studies, involving 29 people in total, used intravenous infusion; seven, involving 131 people, used a conventional oral form; four, involving 1456 participants, used a controlled-release oral form, and one study of 181 people used a verum skin patch. There are no usable results from the intravenous infusion trials, and the few results from the conventional oral form showed no benefit of physostigmine compared with placebo. The results from two of the four studies of the controlled-release physostigmine apply only to a group of patients identified as responders in a pre-randomization titration period. The best dose physostigmine (mean 25mg/day) was associated with a 1.75 point improvement on ADAS-Cog score (mean difference -1.75, 95% confidence interval -2.90, -0.60 on an intention-to-treat basis) and a 0.26 point improvement on the CGIC score (treated as a continuous scale) (mean difference -0.26, 95% confidence interval 0.06, 0.46 on an intention-to-treat basis) compared with placebo at 6 weeks. There were statistically significantly higher numbers of patients from the physostigmine group withdrawing from the trial (22/183 vs 2/183)(OR 5.92, 95% confidence limits 2.59, 13.54) and suffering at least one event of nausea, vomiting, diarhoea, anorexia, dizziness, stomach pain, flatulence or sweating compared with placebo at 6 weeks. The best dose physostigmine (mean 27mg/day) was associated with a 2.0 point improvement on ADAS-Cog score (mean difference -2.02, 95% confidence interval -3.59, -0.45 on an intention to treat basis) compared with placebo at 12 weeks. There were statistically significantly higher numbers of patients from the physostigmine group withdrawing from the trial due to adverse events (13/83 vs 5/93)(OR 3.05, 95% confidence limits 1.15, 8.07) and suffering at least one event of nausea, vomiting, diarhoea, anorexia, dizziness, stomach pain, tremor, asthenia or sweating compared with placebo at 12 weeks. When no attempt was made to identify responders and all relevant patients with Alzheimer's disease were randomized, fixed dose physostigmine (mean 33 mg/day) was associated with a statistically significantly higher number withdrawing (234/358 vs 31/117)(OR 4.82, 95% confidence limits 3.17, 7.33), withdrawing due to adverse events (196/358 vs 10/117) (OR 6.54, 95%confidence limits 4.29, 9.95) and suffering at least one event of nausea, vomiting, diarhoea, anorexia, dizziness, stomach pain, dyspepsia, sweating, asthenia, dyspnoea or abnormal dreaming compared with placebo at 24 weeks. The results from the study of the verum patch physostigmine show that the double dose (delivering mean dose 12mg/day) was associated with statistically significantly higher numbers suffering at least one adverse event of vomiting, nausea or abdominal cramps compared with placebo at 24 weeks, but placebo was associated withstatistically significantly greater numbers of gastrointestinal complaints at 24 weeks compared with single-dose physostigmine.
Reviewers' conclusions: The evidence of effectiveness of physostigmine for the symptomatic treatment of Alzheimer's disease is limited. Even in a controlled release formulation designed to overcome the short half-life, physostigmine showed no convincing benefit and adverse effects remained common leading to a high rate of withdrawal.
Citation: Coelho Filho JM, Birks J. Physostigmine for Alzheimer's disease (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2 2003. Oxford: Update Software.
update-software.com |
